Race interchanged a glance with Poirot, then he said: "I'm sorry too. We'd had hopes."
He got up as a sign the interview was at an end.
Andrew Pennington said: "As Doyle's laid up, I expect he'd like me to see to things. Pardon me, Colonel, but what exactly are the arrangements?"
"When we leave here we shall make a non-stop run to Shellвl, arriving there tomorrow morning."
"And the body?"
"Will be removed to one of the cold storage chambers."
Andrew Pennington bowed his head. Then he left the room.
Poirot and Race again interchanged a glance.
"Mr Pennington," said Race, lighting a cigarette, "was not at all comfortable."
Poirot nodded.
"And," he said, "Mr Pennington was sufficiently perturbed to tell a rather stupid lie. He was not in the temple of Abu Simbel when that boulder fell. I - moi qui vous parle - can swear to that. I had just come from there."
"A very stupid lie," said Race, "and a very revealing one."
Again Poirot nodded.
"But for the moment," he said, and smiled, "we handle him with the gloves of kid, is it not so?"
"That was the idea," agreed Race.
"My friend, you and I understand each other to a marvel."
There was a faint grinding noise, a stir beneath their feet. The Karnak had started on her homeward journey to Shellвl.
"The pearls," said Race. "That is the next thing to be cleared up."
"You have a plan?"
"Yes." He glanced at his watch. "It will be lunch time in half an hour. At the end of the meal I propose to make an announcement - just state the fact that the pearls have been stolen, and that I must request everyone to stay in the dining-saloon while a search is conducted."
Poirot nodded approvingly.
"It is well imagined. Whoever took the pearls still has them. By giving no warning beforehand, there will be no chance of their being thrown overboard in a panic."
Race drew some sheets of paper toward him. He murmured apologetically: "I like to make a brief précis of the facts as I go along. It keeps one's mind free of confusion."
"You do well. Method and order, they are everything," replied Poirot.
Race wrote for some minutes in his small neat script. Finally he pushed the result of his labours toward Poirot.
"Anything you don't agree with there?"
Poirot took up the sheets. They were headed:
'Murder of Mrs Linnet Doyle'
Mrs Doyle was last seen alive by her maid, Louise Bourget. Time: 11.30 (approx). From 11.30-12.20 following have alibis: Cornelia Robson, James Fanthorp, Simon Doyle, Jacqueline de Bellefort - nobody else - but crime almost certainly committed after that time, since it is practically certain that pistol used was Jacqueline de Bellefort's, which was then in her handbag.
That her pistol was used is not absolutely certain until after post-mortem and expert evidence re bullet - but it may be taken as overwhelmingly probable.
Probable course of events: X (murderer) was witness of scene between Jacqueline and Simon Doyle in observation saloon and noted where pistol went under settee. After the saloon was vacant, X procured pistol - his or her idea being that Jacqueline de Bellefort would be thought guilty of crime. On this theory certain people are automatically cleared of suspicion:
Cornelia Robson, since she had no opportunity to take pistol before James Fanthorp returned to search for it.
Miss Bowers - same.
Dr Bessner - same.
N.B. - Fanthorp is not definitely excluded from suspicion, since he could actually have pocketed pistol while declaring himself unable to find it.
Any other person could have taken the pistol during that ten minutes' interval. Possible motives for the murder:
Andrew Pennington. This is on the assumption that he has been guilty of fraudulent practices. There is a certain amount of evidence in favour of that assumption, but not enough to justify making out a case against him. If it was he who rolled down the boulder, he is a man who can seize a chance when it presents itself. The crime, clearly, was not premeditated except in a general way. Last night's shooting scene was an ideal opportunity.
Objections to the theory of Pennington's guilt: Why did he throw the pistol overboard, since it constituted a valuable clue against J.B.?
Fleetwood. Motive, revenge. Fleetwood considered himself injured by Linnet Doyle. Might have overheard scene and noted position of pistol. He may have taken pistol because it was a handy weapon, rather than with the idea of throwing guilt on Jacqueline. This would fit in with throwing it overboard. But if that were the case, why did he write J in blood on the wall?
N.B. - Cheap handkerchief found with pistol more likely to have belonged to a man like Fleetwood than to one of the well-to-do passengers.
Rosalie Otterbourne. Are we to accept Miss Van Schuyler's evidence or Rosalie's denial? Something was thrown overboard at that time and that something was presumably the pistol wrapped up in the velvet stole. Points to be noted. Had Rosalie any motive? She may have disliked Linnet Doyle and even been envious of her - but as a motive for murder that seems grossly inadequate. The evidence against her can be convincing only if we discover an adequate motive. As far as we know, there is no previous knowledge or link between Rosalie Otterbourne and Linnet Doyle.
52书库推荐浏览： [英]阿加莎·克里斯蒂